Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Soiling is a major source of photovoltaic (PV) energy loss in desert environments, where day‐to‐day dust accumulation alternates between steady deposition, rapid storm‐driven degradation, and rare rain‐driven recovery. This study evaluates a light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM [LGBM]) quantile‐regression framework (Q‐LGBM) that issues 72‐h soiling‐ratio forecasts, comprising a conditional median, an 80% prediction interval, and a directional signal, for an outdoor test facility in Doha, Qatar. Inputs combine weather forecasts, air‐quality metrics, solar irradiance, and autoregressive soiling‐ratio lags. Expanding‐window cross‐validation and a sequential temporal holdout are benchmarked against linear‐decay and persistence baselines. Without rain postprocessing, Q‐LGBM reaches a holdout RMSE of 0.0092, statistically indistinguishable from linear decay (Diebold–Mariano p = 0.951), but detects soiling recovery markedly better (upward recall 0.773 vs. 0.227). Under cooler, dustier holdout inputs, the 80% interval widened from 0.040 to 0.060, and empirical coverage rose from 83.3% to 96.2%. Distribution shift diagnostics across inputs, soiling ratios (SRs), and calibration metrics show that input shift coincided with this interval widening, suggesting a candidate trigger for hyperparameter retuning. A supplementary rain‐reset rule yields the lowest cross‐validation RMSE (0.0083) but degrades on the holdout (0.0160) because of numerical precipitation forecast false alarms and subcleaning rainfall.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zafar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: