Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
China’s ocean economy has reached a substantial scale, and the policy objective has consequently shifted from expanding output to improving the quality of development. In 2018, the central authorities called for high-quality development of the ocean economy. In response, China’s coastal provinces began exploring a governance model in which legislation serves as a driver of high-quality growth, giving rise to a distinct form of lawmaking: ocean economy promotion legislation. This form of legislation has since become an increasingly important governance tool in China’s coastal provinces. Nevertheless, existing enactments exhibit several shortcomings, including a tendency to prioritize economic growth over marine environmental protection, the limited binding force of statutory provisions, legislative homogenization, and the absence of a post-legislative evaluation system. To address these issues, the relationship between ocean economy development and marine environmental protection must be better balanced; the binding force of promotional legislation must be strengthened; legal institutions must be tailored to each province’s circumstances; and a system for post-legislative evaluation, together with a dynamic amendment mechanism, must be established. Looking ahead, China should draw on the experience and lessons of provincial ocean economy promotion legislation and, when conditions permit, develop a national-level legal framework to address regional disparities in ocean economy development and provide a sound legal foundation for the healthy, sustainable, and balanced development of the country’s ocean economy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peirui Wang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: