Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Meniscal healing after repair concomitant with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction may vary by lesion characteristics. We evaluated second-look arthroscopic healing rates and factors associated with partial or non-healing, particularly vascular zone. Methods: This retrospective cohort included 109 patients (131 repaired menisci) undergoing second-look arthroscopy at least 12 months after ACL reconstruction with meniscal repair (mean interval, 16.3 ± 6.3 months). Healing was classified as complete, partial, or non-healing. Associations were examined using multivariable logistic generalized estimating equations (GEE) accounting for within-patient clustering. Results: Complete, partial, and non-healing occurred in 73 (55.7%), 34 (26.0%), and 24 (18.3%) menisci, respectively. Complete healing occurred in 41/62 red-red (66.1%) and 32/69 red-white zone tears (46.4%). Higher body mass index (BMI) (per kg/m2: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–1.22; p = 0.04), red-white versus red-red zone location (aOR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.31–8.23; p = 0.01), and more sutures (per suture: aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.08–1.83; p = 0.01) were associated with partial or non-healing in the primary analysis. However, sensitivity analyses showed less consistent associations for BMI and vascular zone, whereas the association with suture number was more consistent. Conclusions: Complete structural healing was observed in selected red-white zone tears. The association between suture number and partial or non-healing was comparatively consistent across analyses, although suture number may reflect tear extent and repair complexity rather than a causal effect. Associations with BMI and vascular zone should be interpreted cautiously.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morishita et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: