Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines hereditas (hereditary land and ius hereditarium) in 11,148 Árpád, 33,882 Angevin, and 9,986 Transylvanian charters (1100–1400). Finds 1,956 hereditas records (7.3% / 2.4% / 3.2%). Documents the terminological shift from terra hereditaria (Árpád dominant) to possessio hereditaria (Angevin dominant), complementing Study 44 (possessio). The near-identical absolute count across the two kingdom periods (818 vs 817) in a 3× larger Angevin corpus confirms stable hereditary documentation against explosive documentary growth. This study is a corpus study: it counts and reads what a large body of edited medieval documents says about one concept, and sets that against modern scholarship. It was prepared with software and AI assistance. The counts, tables, charts and first draft were generated by a program (publisher.py) from the author's corpus, without a language model. The search rules, the concept's introductory paragraphs and the interpretive paragraphs were written with the help of an AI system (Claude, Anthropic), and a random sample of the matches was read in full to measure how many are true instances (section 2). The author read and approved the text before publication. Readings of the Latin marked as preliminary have not yet had a specialist's close reading. The counts depend on what the editions print and how their editors summarised it: editions are uneven by region and decade, modern summaries carry their editors' interpretations, and OCR may miss or misread words, so the numbers show proportions and trends, not totals. The study has not been peer reviewed. Corrections are welcome and will be published as new versions of this record.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mihai Safta (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: