Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rubber waste recycling is a crucial element of the circular economy. However, high uncertainty of secondary resource flows disrupts recycling stability. This study develops an organizational and methodological framework for closed-loop rubber waste management, linking organizational design with operational forecasting. A comparative analysis of organizational models justifies the cluster (centralized) model as the optimal environment for reliable data collection. Using empirical data from a single manufacturing enterprise producing rubber sealing rings by injection molding (610 shift-level observations), two forecasting models were developed and compared: a linear regression model and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network. The MLP identified four significant predictors: production volume, vulcanization time, sulfur content deviation, and mold wear. Scenario analysis revealed a non-linear relationship between production and waste generation: higher production increased waste (up to 2.20 kg/shift), while extreme secondary-factor deviations (mold wear 54%; sulfur deviation 1.08%) caused waste to peak at 1.65 kg/shift even at the lowest production volume (1300 units/shift). The approach provides a transparent, interpretable mathematical expression for process engineers, shifting waste management from reactive to proactive control. Given the single-enterprise, single-product dataset, independent validation is required before wider application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malysheva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: