Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Drawing on the ecological framework of agency, this study investigates how L2 university students exercise writer agency in English expository writing within multilingual and AI-supported contexts, focusing on how learners mobilise linguistic and technological affordances during writing. Data were collected from three Chinese EFL students through screen recordings, stimulated recalls, semi-structured interviews and written drafts. Qualitative thematic analysis examined the dynamics of L2 writer agency across the writing process. The findings revealed a dynamic AI-supported writing process in which L2 writer agency was enacted through learners’ continued coordination of linguistic, technological and other available resources while they maintained involvement in meaning-making and writing decisions. In these cases, differences in L2 writer agency could not be understood simply in terms of the extent of AI use. Learners’ past experiences, future-oriented goals, and present practical-evaluative judgments were associated with different ways in which writer agency was enacted during writing. This study extends an ecological understanding of L2 writer agency to AI-supported multilingual writing by highlighting its dynamic, temporal and context-dependent nature. The findings suggest that AI-supported L2 writing pedagogy should focus not simply on AI use, but on learners’ ability to critically draw on available support while retaining control over their writing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: