Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines associations between climate-smart dairy technologies and practices (CSDTPs) adoption profiles and multidimensional food security (MDFS) among 734 smallholder dairy households in Northwest Ethiopia using cross-sectional survey design. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified three profiles: selective (19.5%), intermediate (45.9%), and intensive-diversified adoption (34.6%). Augmented-inverse probability weighting (AIPW) estimated the adjusted counterfactual contrast, with inverse-probability weighting regression adjustment (IPWRA) and inverse-probability weighting (IPW) estimators as a robustness checks. Compared with selective adoption, both adoption profiles had lower food insecurity deprivation scores across the four MDFS dimensions. The intensive-diversified adoption generally showed larger estimated differences relative to the selective profile mean: 23.46% for quantity, 10.35% for quantity, 27.22% for acceptability, and 16.62% for stability. Sensitivity analysis broadly supported the findings, although the quality contrast of intermediate profile was not robust to kebele-clustered standard errors. For binary MDFS, compared to selective adoption, intermediate and intensive-diversified adoption profiles were associated with 11.70% and 12.20% lower probabilities of food insecurity, respectively; their difference however, was not statistically significant. These findings highlight the relevance of context-specific combinations of CSDTPs in relation to MDFS. However, the cross-sectional design limits causal interpretation, longitudinal and experimental studies are needed to establish causal effects and investigate underlying mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hussein et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: