Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Population size history can be estimated from genomes; methods from PSMC to phlash fit a coalescent model. Sequencing errors and recombination-rate variation are hard to write into such a model but easy to simulate, so we trained a neural estimator, NeCast, on simulations containing both. From unphased genotypes of 32 individuals in a 30-megabase window and its recombination map, it estimates sizes 50 to 500,000 generations ago. On error-free simulated windows, NeCast was about as accurate as phlash, more accurate than SMC++ and FitCoal, and took 7.4 s on a 16-core CPU, against their 5 min to 7.6 h. Sequencing errors raised its RMSE (log10 Ne) from 0.150 to 0.175, and between low-coverage and 30× data for the same individuals its estimates differed less than phlash's. Without a map it underestimated recent sizes; the map largely corrected this in simulations and raised recent estimates in all 26 1000 Genomes populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: