Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives To compare maternal comfort between the supine and left lateral positions during fetal MRI and to assess fetal brain image quality with a conventional body array coil vs. a super-flexible coil on a 75-cm bore system. Methods In this prospective study, 50 women with singleton pregnancies (gestational age 25–36 weeks) referred for suspected fetal brain abnormalities underwent MRI on a 75-cm bore 3.0-T system. Each was scanned in both the supine and left lateral positions (order randomized) and rated comfort for each on a five-point Likert scale. Fetal brain images were analysed as three within-subject conditions: supine with conventional coil, supine with super-flexible coil, and left lateral with super-flexible coil. Image quality was assessed subjectively and objectively using repeated-measures analyses. Results Comfort scores were higher in the left lateral position than supine (4.2±0.8 vs. 3.8±0.9; p=0.031), particularly in late pregnancy. Subjective image quality did not differ significantly among conditions. In the primary positional contrast (super-flexible coil held constant), the left lateral position yielded significantly higher SNR in 17 of the 20 brain regions and higher CNR in six of the eight regions (all q <0.05 after false-discovery-rate correction), with differences most pronounced in late pregnancy (15 of 28 metrics remained significant after correction in the late-pregnancy subgroup vs. none in mid-pregnancy). Conclusions On a 75-cm bore system, the left lateral position improves maternal comfort, especially in late pregnancy, without compromising image quality; combined with a super-flexible coil, it may optimize fetal brain image quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: