Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Nursing-home residents with acute infection are commonly transferred to hospital, where they are exposed to delirium, functional decline and iatrogenic harm. In October 2024 our nursing home implemented Hospital-at-Home (HaH) under Taiwan’s Acute Care At Home program, using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to treat pneumonia, urinary tract infection (UTI) and soft-tissue infection (SSTI) on site. We asked whether hospital-level infection care could be delivered safely within the nursing home. Methods Retrospective service evaluation at one central-Taiwan nursing home (HaH period October 2024–December 2025), with a before-and-after description of infection-related hospital use (pre-implementation January–September 2024). Residents entered HaH directly from the nursing home (Model B) or after emergency-department assessment (Model C). Outcomes were completion without escalation to inpatient care, rehospitalization and mortality; the route comparison is descriptive. Results There were 130 HaH episodes (81 UTI, 42 pneumonia, 7 SSTI) in 87 residents (episode-level median age 79.6 years; Barthel Index < 20 in 100 episodes, 76.9%). HaH was completed without escalation in 116 of 130 episodes (89.2%, 95% CI 82.6–94.0). No death occurred during a HaH episode; 30-day mortality was 5 of 130 (3.8%, 1.3–8.7), a lower bound because ascertainment used study-hospital records only. Among the 116 completers, 6 (5.2%, 1.9–10.9) were rehospitalized within 7 days. Within 30 days of treatment ending, 18 of 130 (13.8%) were admitted for any cause and 10 (7.7%) for the same infection. Post-/pre- inpatient rate ratios per 1,000 resident-days were 0.68 (0.41–1.11) for UTI, 0.33 (0.10–1.01) for SSTI and 1.06 (0.73–1.55) for pneumonia; total hospital-level infection care (inpatient plus HaH) rose from 3.15 to 5.22 care contacts per 1,000 resident-days (5.02, ≈+59%, after de-duplication). Completion was 95.9% in Model B and 80.7% in Model C, a difference largely confined to pneumonia, where the routes’ diagnostic standards differed. Conclusions In a frail, highly dependent nursing-home population, POCUS-supported HaH enabled most residents with pneumonia, UTI or SSTI to complete hospital-level treatment without inpatient admission, with no deaths during treatment. The hospitalization data show a shift in where infection care was delivered, not a reduction in infection burden; whether HaH reduces admissions, cost or harm requires controlled prospective study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: