Key result
Social determinants and socioeconomic status dictate whether women at risk of HF engage in self-care.
Why the study?
Women with heart failure experience slower diagnosis, less aggressive treatment, and greater symptom burden, with physiological and social factors contributing to increased adverse outcomes. This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of women across socioeconomic areas regarding the effects of social determinants of health on their self-care behaviours.
How do social determinants of health and socioeconomic status influence self-care behaviours among women at risk of and diagnosed with heart failure in Ireland?
How do social determinants of health and socioeconomic status influence self-care behaviours among women at risk of and diagnosed with heart failure in Ireland?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This qualitative study demonstrates that socioeconomic deprivation, caregiving burdens, and systemic gender inequities force less affluent and minority women with or at risk of heart failure into a reactive survival mode rather than proactive self-care, highlighting the need for vulnerability assessments and flexible community-embedded cardiac care.
Heart failure is increasing, particularly in women over 65 years old. Diagnosis in women is slower, they are treated less aggressively and have a greater symptom burden, which is associated with more days in hospital. Physiological and social factors attribute to the heart failure burden among women leading to increased adverse outcomes for women. The aim of this research was to provide women across various socio-economic areas an opportunity to explore their real world lived experiences of the effects of Social Determinants of Health (SDH) on their self-care behaviours. Focus groups were conducted exploring social determinant of health factors affecting women both at risk and diagnosed with heart failure. Six primary care practices in different socioeconomic areas (affluent, average, below average) were contacted and referred women at risk of or diagnosed with heart failure to the research team. One additional ethnic minority group were identified as a fourth cohort. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Twenty-eight women participated in four peer-based focus groups. All groups fundamentally understood self-care. However, social determinant factors, specifically diet, healthcare access and a caring burden, dictated their capacity to enact self-care. Group differences emerged: from the affluent luxury of choice; the average sandwich generation with time constraints; the below average group were challenged by logistics of chronic illness; and the minority group prioritising survival over health choices. Four additional themes were agreed: life perspectives, the disadvantage of being a woman, loneliness and stress. The themes capture systematic gender discrimination and traditional expectations of women which have actively compromised women’s professional and physical autonomy. The findings suggest that socioeconomic status is the primary influence at the individual level as to whether a woman can engage in preventative health or is forced into a reactive survival mode. This study highlights the urgent need to address systemic inequities to improve cardiac outcomes and quality of life for women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryder et al. (2026) studied Heart failure or at risk of heart failure (n=28). Social Determinants of Health (socioeconomic status, diet, healthcare access, and caring burden) vs. Comparison across four socioeconomic/demographic groups (affluent, average, below average, and ethnic minority) was evaluated on Lived experiences and self-care behaviours explored via qualitative reflexive thematic analysis of focus groups. Socioeconomic status and social determinants—specifically diet, healthcare access, and caring burden—dictated whether women with or at risk of HF engaged in proactive self-care or reactive survival.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: