Coronary vessels with intermediate stenoses and normal FFR (>0.80) frequently exhibited disturbed hemodynamics, with higher microcirculatory resistance than those with FFR≤0.80 (27.6 vs 17.3; P=0.001).
Observational (n=78)
Chronic ischemic heart disease with intermediate coronary stenoses (n=78)
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) > 0.80 vs FFR ≤ 0.80
Index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), p=0.001
Absolute Event Rate: 27.6% vs 17.3%
p-value: p=0.001
BACKGROUND: In chronic ischemic heart disease, focal stenosis, diffuse atherosclerotic narrowings, and microcirculatory dysfunction (MCD) contribute to limit myocardial flow. The prevalence of these ischemic heart disease levels in fractional flow reserve (FFR) interrogated vessels remains largely unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using intracoronary measurements, 91 coronaries (78 patients) with intermediate stenoses were classified in 4 FFR and coronary flow reserve (CFR) agreement groups, using FFR>0.80 and CFR0.80, most (63%) presented disturbed hemodynamics: abnormal CFR in 28 (52%) and MCD in 18 (33%). Vessels with FFR>0.80 presented higher IMR adjusted mean 27.6 (95% confidence interval, 23.4-31.8) than those with FFR≤0.80 17.3 (95% confidence interval, 13.0-21.7), p=0.001. Atherosclerotic burden was inversely correlated with CFR (r=-0.207, P=0.055), and in vessels with FFR>0.80 and CFR0.80 present disturbed hemodynamics. Integration of FFR, CFR, and IMR supports the existence of differentiated patterns of ischemic heart disease that combine focal and diffuse coronary narrowings with variable degrees of MCD.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Echavarría‐Pinto et al. (Sat,) conducted a observational in Chronic ischemic heart disease with intermediate coronary stenoses (n=78). Fractional flow reserve (FFR) > 0.80 vs. FFR ≤ 0.80 was evaluated on Index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) (p=0.001). Coronary vessels with intermediate stenoses and normal FFR (>0.80) frequently exhibited disturbed hemodynamics, with higher microcirculatory resistance than those with FFR≤0.80 (27.6 vs 17.3; P=0.001).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1673f4c1ea77d8cb6245e5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.112.001345
Mauro Echavarría‐Pinto
Interventional Cardiology
Javier Escaned
Interventional Cardiology
Enrico Macías
Evotec (United States)
Circulation
Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...