Does diuretic therapy administered by bolus or high dose improve symptoms or renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
Patients with acute decompensated heart failure
Diuretic therapy administered by bolus or at a high dose
Diuretic therapy administered by continuous infusion or at a low dose
Patients' global assessment of symptoms or change in renal functionpatient reported
In patients with acute decompensated heart failure, the strategy of diuretic administration (bolus vs. continuous infusion, high vs. low dose) does not significantly affect symptom relief or short-term renal function.
Among patients with acute decompensated heart failure, there were no significant differences in patients' global assessment of symptoms or in the change in renal function when diuretic therapy was administered by bolus as compared with continuous infusion or at a high dose as compared with a low dose. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00577135.).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
G. Michael Felker
University of Vermont
Kerry L. Lee
Northwestern University
David A. Bull
Cardiac Surgery
New England Journal of Medicine
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Massachusetts General Hospital
Duke University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Felker et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d56c3a75589c71d767cd05 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1005419