Isoproterenol suppressed electrical storms in 7 of 7 acute cases, and quinidine eliminated recurrent VF in 9 of 9 chronic cases, whereas other antiarrhythmic drugs were poorly effective.
Cohort (n=122)
Yes
Do specific antiarrhythmic drugs prevent recurrent ventricular fibrillation in patients with idiopathic VF and inferolateral early repolarization?
122 patients (90 male, age 37 +/- 12 years) with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF) and early repolarization abnormality in the inferolateral leads, specifically focusing on 33 patients with multiple (>3) episodes of VF including 16 with electrical storms.
Various antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) chosen by individual physicians, including isoproterenol (acute), quinidine (chronic), beta-blockers, lidocaine/mexiletine, verapamil, amiodarone, and class 1C AADs.
Successful oral AAD therapy, defined as elimination of all recurrences of VF with a minimal follow-up period of 12 months.hard clinical
Isoproterenol and quinidine are highly effective for the acute and chronic suppression, respectively, of recurrent ventricular fibrillation in patients with inferolateral early repolarization.
OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in recurrent ventricular fibrillation (VF) associated with inferolateral early repolarization pattern on the electrocardiogram. BACKGROUND: Although an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is the treatment of choice, additional AADs may be necessary to prevent frequent episodes of VF and reduce implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock burden or as a lifesaving therapy in electrical storms. METHODS: From a multicenter cohort of 122 patients (90 male subjects, age 37 +/- 12 years) with idiopathic VF and early repolarization abnormality in the inferolateral leads, we selected all patients with more than 3 episodes of VF (multiple) including those with electrical storms (> or =3 VF in 24 h). The choice of AAD was decided by individual physicians. Follow-up data were obtained for all patients using monitoring with implantable defibrillator. Successful oral AAD was defined as elimination of all recurrences of VF with a minimal follow-up period of 12 months. RESULTS: Multiple episodes of VF were observed in 33 (27%) patients. Electrical storms (34 +/- 47 episodes) occurred in 16 and were unresponsive to beta-blockers (11 of 11), lidocaine/mexiletine (9 of 9), and verapamil (3 of 3), while amiodarone was partially effective (3 of 10). In contrast, isoproterenol infusion immediately suppressed electrical storms in 7 of 7 patients. Over a follow-up of 69 +/- 58 months, oral AADs were poorly effective in preventing recurrent VF: beta-blockers (2 of 16), verapamil (0 of 4), mexiletine (0 of 4), amiodarone (1 of 7), and class 1C AADs (2 of 9). Quinidine was successful in 9 of 9 patients, decreasing recurrent VF from 33 +/- 35 episodes to nil for 25 +/- 18 months. In addition, quinidine restored a normal electrocardiogram. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple recurrences of VF occurred in 27% of patients with early repolarization abnormality and may be life threatening. Isoproterenol in acute cases and quinidine in chronic cases are effective AADs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michel Haı̈ssaguerre
Electrophysiology
Frédéric Sacher
Electrophysiology
Akihiko Nogami
Electrophysiology
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Heidelberg University
KU Leuven
University Hospital Heidelberg
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Haı̈ssaguerre et al. (Sun,) conducted a cohort in Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation with inferolateral early repolarization (n=122). Antiarrhythmic drugs (isoproterenol, quinidine) was evaluated on Elimination of all recurrences of VF with a minimal follow-up period of 12 months. Isoproterenol suppressed electrical storms in 7 of 7 acute cases, and quinidine eliminated recurrent VF in 9 of 9 chronic cases, whereas other antiarrhythmic drugs were poorly effective.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0b2de33a96fd342f4319bf — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.10.044