New antiarrhythmic drugs introduced over the past decade overwhelmingly fit into the four originally described classes of action, with alinidine potentially representing a fifth class.
The past decade has seen the introduction of many new class 1 drugs, restricting fast inward current. Confirmative evidence has been obtained that the antiarrthymic action of lidocaine and diphenylhydantoin is indeed due to their effect as class 1 agents depressing conduction. The original class 3 drug, amiodarone, is increasingly in use as an antiarrhythmic of first choice for WPW and for arrhythmias associated with hypertrophic myopathy, and as a reserve drug in resistant arrhythmias of other types. Other compounds delaying repolarization have proved to be clinically effective as antiarrhythmics. In addition to their class 2 antiarrhythymic action exhibited acutely, on long-term treatment beta blockers have a class 3 action, which might be, at least in part, responsible for the protection of postinfarction patients against sudden death. Recent research suggests that inhibition of slow inward current may lead, as a secondary consequence of lowered Cai, to improved cell-to-cell conduction. Finally, all but one of the new antiarrhythmic drugs, none of which existed in 1972, have turned out to possess one or more of the four classes of action originally described. This can hardly be a coincidence. The single exception, alinidine, a selective bradycardic agent, may restrict anionic currents, which would constitute a fifth class of action, but this is far from proved.
E. M. Vaughan Williams (Sun,) conducted a review in Arrhythmias. Antiarrhythmic drugs was evaluated. New antiarrhythmic drugs introduced over the past decade overwhelmingly fit into the four originally described classes of action, with alinidine potentially representing a fifth class.