Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Peer review has been the principal way of evaluating scientific articles, ensuring that publications meet standards of methodology, integrity, and ethics. Occasionally, however, reviews are suboptimal, especially those by inexperienced reviewers. Therefore, this article offers suggestions on how to review a scientific article. Some of the most important suggestions include submitting the review in a timely fashion without undue delay, not breeching confidentiality, focusing mainly on the methodology, following specific format, and avoiding embarrassing comments to the authors.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Miltos K. Lazarides
Democritus University of Thrace
George S. Georgiadis
Democritus University of Thrace
Νικόλαος Παπάνας
Democritus University of Thrace
The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
Democritus University of Thrace
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lazarides et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1aec26837f1a2c63b93da9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734620924349