The XGBoost machine learning model demonstrated superior predictive ability for in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with acute heart failure, achieving an AUC of 0.8215 compared to 0.7779 for LODS.
Observational (n=5,114)
No
Does the XGBoost machine learning model accurately predict in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with acute heart failure?
The XGBoost machine learning model effectively predicts in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with acute heart failure, outperforming traditional scoring systems like SOFA and SAPSII.
Absolute Event Rate: 0.8215% vs 0.7779%
Abstract Background The incidence rate, mortality rate and readmission rate of acute heart failure (AHF) are high, and the in-hospital mortality of AHF patients in ICU is higher. However, there is no method to accurately predict the mortality of AHF patients at present. Methods The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Ⅳ (MIMIC-Ⅳ) database was used to perform a retrospective study. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were identified from the MIMIC-Ⅳ database and randomly divided into training set (n = 3580, 70%) and validation set (n = 1534, 30%). The variates we collected include demographic data, vital signs, comorbidities, laboratory test results and treatment information within 24 hours of ICU admission. By using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression model in the training set, we screened variates that affect the in-hospital mortality of AHF patients. Subsequently, in the training set, five common machine learning (ML) algorithms were applied to construct models using variates selected by LASSO to predict the in-hospital mortality of AHF patients. We evaluated the predictive ability of the models by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC), and clinical net benefit in the validation set. In order to obtain a model with the best predictive ability, we compared the predictive ability of common scoring systems with the best ML model. Results Among the 5114 patients, in-hospital mortality was 12.5%. By comparing AUC, the XGBoost model had the best predictive ability among all ML models, and the XGBoost model was chosen as our final model for its higher net benefit. Meanwhile, its predictive ability is superior to common scoring systems. Conclusions The XGBoost model can effectively predict the in-hospital mortality of AHF patients admitted to the ICU, which may assist clinicians in precise management and early intervention of patients with AHF to reduce mortality.
Li et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Acute heart failure (AHF) (n=5,114). XGBoost machine learning model vs. Common scoring systems (LODS, SAPSII, SOFA) was evaluated on Area under the curve (AUC) for in-hospital mortality prediction. The XGBoost machine learning model demonstrated superior predictive ability for in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with acute heart failure, achieving an AUC of 0.8215 compared to 0.7779 for LODS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: