Abstract ABSTRACT: The primary objective of this study is to illustrate why an adequate historical inquiry should be considered an integral part of all "events" studies. We examine a recent events study that attempted to test the impact of the Securities Act of 1933. Our examination of the historical record results in three major criticisms of the author's research design: (1) lack of a control group, (2) an unsubstantiated test period, and (3) apparent misclassification of events (favorable/unfavorable/control) during the test period. We believe that these problems invalidate the conclusion that the Securities Act of 1933 had an adverse impact on stockholders' wealth.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Barbara D. Merino
Louisiana State University
Bruce Koch
Seattle University
Kenneth MacRitchie
University of Rochester
The Accounting Review
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Merino et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69be37aa6e48c4981c677729 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-4487078
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: