This paper proposes an axiomatic theoretical framework based on the Unified Primordial Field, aiming to achieve a logically consistent unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics, and to incorporate electromagnetic, strong, weak and gravitational interactions into a unified fundamental physical logic. The core of the theory consists of two basic axioms: the ontological existence of the 11-dimensional Unified Primordial Field across the entire universe, and the Global Field Equilibrium Principle. Within this framework, spacetime structure, forms of matter and fundamental interactions can all be characterized by the topological deformation, coherent vortices and eigenstanding waves of the Unified Primordial Field. Gravity corresponds to the large-scale topological curvature effect of the Primordial Field; gauge interactions originate from vortex dynamics and symmetry breaking mechanisms of the Primordial Field in compact dimensions; and discrete quantum characteristics are determined by the stability conditions of coherent standing waves in the Primordial Field. This theory provides self-consistent physical interpretations for several core open problems in physics, including the Yang-Mills mass gap, discrete quantum orbits, electron cloud probability distribution, and the Meissner effect in superconductivity. It also proposes a realizable path for ambient-pressure and room-temperature superconductivity verifiable in standard laboratory settings. Meanwhile, this paper points out that the topological and symmetric structures of the theory are naturally compatible with the Langlands program,opening a new research path for the fundamental unification of physics and mathematics.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jiawei Xie
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jiawei Xie (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cd30fdc3bde448919298 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19209266
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: