Based on the model of massless vacuum superfluid with elastic repulsion, this paper takes the Planck scale a=lp as the fundamental structural unit of the universe to provide a unified derivation of the microscopic origins of gravity, electromagnetism, the strong interaction, and the weak interaction. In this framework, mass is interpreted as the source of density perturbations in the vacuum superfluid, electric charge as the source of flux and vorticity, and the proton as a closed vortex ring structure. Newton’s law of universal gravitation and Coulomb’s law are naturally recovered from the fundamental equations of fluid mechanics, namely the continuity equation and Bernoulli’s principle. Furthermore, the line tension of the strong interaction is deduced from the proton’s interfacial pressure, while a unified vortex dynamical interpretation is provided for the weak interaction. We show that the gravitational constant G, the electromagnetic coupling coefficient 1/(4πϵ0), and the strong interaction line tension σ are uniquely determined by the fundamental scale a, the speed of light c, and the reduced Planck constant ℏ. It is also demonstrated that ℏ represents the intrinsic minimum angular momentum quantum of the vacuum superfluid, dynamically determined by a and c. A clear hierarchical causation is established: primitive quantities a,c→ℏ→G,1/(4πϵ0), with no circular definitions and no free parameters. This framework naturally unifies the four fundamental forces and offers a concise microscopic mechanism for a self-consistent quantum gravity theory. The derived results show high consistency with experimental observations and Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) predictions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
jiaman lin
chuanzai lin
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
lin et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e471ef010ef96374d8e288 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19631071
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: