The rapid advancement of quantum computing poses a fundamental threat to classical public-key cryptographic systems, necessitating the transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC). While significant progress has been made in the standardization of quantum-resistant algorithms, their practical deployment in heterogeneous environments—particularly resource-constrained Internet of Things (IoT) devices—remains a critical challenge. This study presents a comprehensive experimental evaluation of four NIST-standardized PQC algorithms: CRYSTALS-Kyber (ML-KEM), CRYSTALS-Dilithium (ML-DSA), FALCON, and SPHINCS+. The scope of these findings is bounded by an empirical analysis conducted across two specific testing platforms, a high-performance x86-64 workstation (AMD Ryzen 7 5700U) and a resource-constrained embedded microcontroller (ESP32-WROOM), utilizing dedicated software environments implemented in Native C, Go, and Python. The evaluation isolates key performance indicators, including computational latency, memory consumption, communication overhead, and temporal determinism, based on benchmarking over 1000 iterations. Within this experimental setup, results demonstrate clear trade-offs between target security categories, execution performance, and structural memory limits. Lattice-based schemes such as Kyber and Falcon exhibit optimal efficiency and scalability on the tested embedded platform, while the specific memory limits of the ESP32 platform introduce architectural stability constraints for higher-tier Dilithium variants. In contrast, SPHINCS+ provides structural robustness at the cost of higher computational hashing latency within these evaluation environments. The findings highlight the critical role of hardware-specific constraints and language runtime design choices in enabling practical PQC deployment, providing context-specific insights supporting the secure migration of IoT infrastructures toward quantum-resilient systems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lucaciu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2900ff6f82f25be989d67b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app16125781
Daiana-Larisa Lucaciu
University of Oradea
Daniela Elena Popescu
University of Oradea
Applied Sciences
University of Oradea
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: