Abstract This paper analyzes the principal's choice of budget-based contracts in a multi-period setting. In particular, two budget-based contracts are considered in which performance standards are used to evaluate the cost performance of managers who are rewarded by predetermined bonus amounts: (1) a “bangbang” contract and (2) a conditional investigation contract. Agent preferences are assumed to be stochastic and time dependent to more faithfully capture multi-period agency conflicts. A simple, decision heuristic for the principal's choice of budget-based contracts in a multi-period setting is developed. The heuristic involves treating the agent's behavior as a stochastic variable that is related to the performance standard and minimizing the principal's expected long-run costs using a simple “steady-stateǜ Markovian solution. Numerical analyses suggest that the heuristic makes “reasonably” efficient trade-offs between budget-based contract parameters (bonus amounts and performance standards) relative to an optimal benchmark for the cost processes examined.
Douglas A. Schroeder (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: