Analyses budget-based contracts to optimize costs in multi-period agency conflicts, suggesting efficient trade-offs.
This paper analyzes the principal's choice of budget-based contracts in a multi-period setting. In particular, two budget-based contracts are considered in which performance standards are used to evaluate the cost performance of managers who are rewarded by predetermined bonus amounts: (1) a “bangbang” contract and (2) a conditional investigation contract. Agent preferences are assumed to be stochastic and time dependent to more faithfully capture multi-period agency conflicts. A simple, decision heuristic for the principal's choice of budget-based contracts in a multi-period setting is developed. The heuristic involves treating the agent's behavior as a stochastic variable that is related to the performance standard and minimizing the principal's expected long-run costs using a simple “steady-stateǜ Markovian solution. Numerical analyses suggest that the heuristic makes “reasonably” efficient trade-offs between budget-based contract parameters (bonus amounts and performance standards) relative to an optimal benchmark for the cost processes examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Douglas A. Schroeder (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: