What question did this study set out to answer?

This analysis critiques Alessandro Ingusci's Theory of the Interactive Fabric of Time and its compatibility with the Theory of Objectivity.

June 15, 2026Open Access

TENSOSTASIS, EMERGENT TIME, AND THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Alessandro Ingusci's Relational Dynamic Ontology of Tension — Theory of the Interactive Fabric of Time V4.2 in confrontation with the axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras of TO

Key Points

This analysis critiques Alessandro Ingusci's Theory of the Interactive Fabric of Time and its compatibility with the Theory of Objectivity.
Critical-propositional analysis of Ingusci’s model based on informational tension and relational states.
Examination of Jensen–Shannon divergence and Fisher–Rao geometry in the context of time and tension.
Dialogue between the frameworks of Ingusci’s theory and the axioms of Objectivity theory.
TIT presents relations of informational emergence that challenge the absolute notion of physical time.
Identified tensions between TIT's starting point of pre-formed states and TO's requirement for logical deduction from Nothing.
TIT can serve as an auxiliary model for understanding temporalization within differentiated systems.

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Alessandro Ingusci’s Relational Dynamic Ontology of Tension — Theory of the Interactive Fabric of Time V4.2 (TIT) (2026), in dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines Ingusci’s model of emergent physical time as a result of informational tension, friction, and dissipation among relational states, formally articulated through Jensen–Shannon divergence, Fisher–Rao geometry, and the variational principle of Tensostasis. The analysis argues that TIT establishes a significant field of dialogue with TO because both frameworks reject the absolute fundamentality of physical time and emphasize relation, boundary, tension, informational emergence, and structural convergence. Particular attention is given to the compatibility between TIT and the modal axioms of TO, especially boundary, recursive composition, and the transcendent element understood in TO as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. At the same time, the article identifies important points of tension. TIT begins from already constituted informational states, whereas TO requires a modal-cosmogonic deduction from the logical spherical Nothing. TIT also formalizes mainly the reductive movement of tension toward equilibrium, while TO requires the joint articulation of expansive and reductive Inducer Effects. Therefore, the article proposes that TIT should not be read as a substitute for the cosmogonic theorem of TO, but as a potentially useful auxiliary model for operationalizing temporalization through informational tension in already differentiated systems. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Denivaldo Silva; Alessandro Ingusci; Theory of the Interactive Fabric of Time; TIT V4.2; Tensostasis; emergent time; informational friction; Jensen–Shannon divergence; Fisher–Rao geometry; modal ontology; logical spherical Nothing; Inducer Effects; atomic radiation; transcendent substance; cosmology; philosophy of physics.

Read Full Paperexternally

Perguntar à IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper