Vascular Medicine
L1 subspecialty spine topic for Vascular Medicine (seeded from backend/data/cardiology_taxonomy.yaml).
Also called PAD, aortic disease, VTE, pulmonary embolism
Sources: 12 new papers · 5 key papers · updated Oct 20, 2026
Unverified · drafted by AI from the sources cited below
Acute pulmonary embolism is a leading cause of cardiovascular death.1
Evaluation of pulmonary embolism includes assessment of clinical probability and, if indicated, d-dimer testing.1 Pretest probability scores including the Wells clinical prediction rule and the revised Geneva score act as first line assessments to determine the need for further diagnostic testing.2 For imaging, the Pulmonary Embolism Reporting and Data System provides a standardized framework for reporting acute pulmonary embolism at CT and MR angiography.3 Risk stratification tools such as the Hestia criteria, Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index, and simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index help to identify patients appropriate for outpatient management.2
Most patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism can be treated with oral anticoagulants.1 In patients with acute, intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism, ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed fibrinolysis plus anticoagulation led to a lower risk of the composite of pulmonary embolism-related death, cardiopulmonary decompensation or collapse, or symptomatic recurrence of pulmonary embolism within 7 days than anticoagulation alone.2
Pulmonary Embolism Reporting and Data System (PE-RADS™) v2026 for the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism on CT and MR Angiography
Radiology — Koweek L — Jul 2026
Prevalence and incidence of pulmonary embolism in China: a scoping review
European Journal of Emergency Medicine — LI Y — May 2026
Updated - Wells’ Criteria for Pulmonary Embolism
Evidence to Action Official Journal of MDCalc — Husain A — May 2026
Updated Review of the Wells’ Criteria for Pulmonary Embolism
Evidence to Action Official Journal of MDCalc — Husain A — Apr 2026
MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE PULMONARY EMBOLISM: A CLINICAL REVIEW
Postgraduate Medical Journal — Murch N — Apr 2026
Ultrasound-Facilitated, Catheter-Directed Fibrinolysis for Acute Pulmonary Embolism
New England Journal of Medicine — Rosenfield K — Mar 2026
Risk stratification in pulmonary embolism: current evidence and future directions
The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery — Jadi J — Feb 2026
CIRSE Standards of Practice on Endovascular Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology — Ciampi-Dopazo J — Jan 2026
The dual role of Iliac vein compression in the occurrence of pulmonary embolism
Thrombosis Journal — Liu D — Oct 2025
Pulmonary Embolism
New England Journal of Medicine — Kahn S
195 citations · 2022 · among the most cited on Vascular Medicine
Ultrasound-Facilitated, Catheter-Directed Fibrinolysis for Acute Pulmonary Embolism
New England Journal of Medicine — Rosenfield K
83 citations · 2026 · among the most cited on Vascular Medicine
Comparison of international guideline recommendations for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
The Lancet Haematology — Falster C
54 citations · 2023 · among the most cited on Vascular Medicine
Sex, Racial, and Geographic Disparities in Pulmonary Embolism–related Mortality Nationwide
Annals of the American Thoracic Society — Zghouzi M
44 citations · 2023 · among the most cited on Vascular Medicine
Pulmonary Embolism and Heart Failure: A Reappraisal
Cardiac failure review — Arrigo M
30 citations · 2021 · among the most cited on Vascular Medicine
A clinical question appears here only when its condition matches this topic, an outcome and a comparator were extracted from the studies, at least two studies and a patient count are on file, and the certainty is low or higher.
Supports benefit, no benefit shown, and mixed describe the direction of the measured effect. No benefit shown means the evidence does not support a benefit. It is not a finding of harm. Too little evidence means the question did not clear that bar.
Study count, RCT count, and patient count are separate. The patient total adds only studies that are linked into a study family and whose sample size is not flagged as implausible. A reversal is listed only when at least one randomized trial sits on each side of the change.
The overview is drafted from the guideline recommendations, trials, papers, and questions on this page, and every sentence has to cite one of them. It stays unverified until an NPI-verified clinician or a Synapse admin approves it. Approving records that person's name.
Most-cited researchers publishing on Vascular Medicine.