PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2010Frontiers in Physiology18 citationsOpen Access

Anti- or profibrillatory effects of Na+ channel blockade depend on the site of application relative to gradients in repolarization

View Full Paper
RCRuben Coronel

Key Result

Sodium channel blockade with flecainide was antifibrillatory when applied to myocardium with a short refractory period, but profibrillatory when applied to myocardium with a long refractory period.

Structured PICO

Does the site of sodium channel blockade application relative to repolarization gradients determine its anti- or profibrillatory effects in isolated porcine hearts?

P
Population
Isolated porcine hearts (n=8) with induced repolarization heterogeneity via selective perfusion of vascular beds (sotalol 220 μM in one bed, pinacidil 80 μM in adjacent bed)
I
Intervention
Flecainide infusion in the pinacidil domain (short refractory period) or sotalol domain (long refractory period)
C
Comparator
Baseline state prior to flecainide infusion
O
Outcome
Induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and changes in Fibrillation Factor (FF)surrogate

Sodium channel blockade exhibits anti- or profibrillatory effects depending on whether it is applied to myocardium with a short or long refractory period, providing a mechanistic basis for these opposing effects.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • Restricted time frame in which measurements can be made, preventing study of long-term effects
  • Only epicardial mapping was performed, lacking information on intramural gradients
  • Artificial model of VF inducibility based on large and steep gradients in repolarization

Abstract

Sodium channel blockers are associated with arrhythmic sudden death, although they are considered antiarrhythmic agents. The mechanism of these opposing effects is unknown. We used a model of induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF) based on selective perfusion of the vascular beds of isolated porcine hearts (n = 8). One bed was perfused with sotalol (220 μM), the adjacent bed with pinacidil (80 μM), leading to repolarization heterogeneity (late repolarization in the sotalol-, early in the pinacidil-area). Premature stimulation from the area with the short action potential was performed. Epicardial activation/repolarization mapping was done. In three of the eight hearts VF was inducible prior to infusion of flecainide. In those hearts the Fibrillation Factor (FF), the interval between the earliest repolarization of the premature beat (S2) in the early repolarizing (pinacidil) domain, and the last S2-activation in the late repolarizing (sotalol) domain, was significantly shorter than in the hearts without VF (33 ± 22 vs 93 ± 11 ms, m ± SEM, p < 0.05). In the three hearts with VF flecainide was infused in the pinacidil domain after defibrillation. This led to shortening of the line of block, local delay of S2 activation and repolarization, an increase in FF and failure to induce VF. In the five hearts without VF, flecainide was subsequently infused in the sotalol domain. This led to a local delay of S2 activation, a shortening of FF (by 47 ± 3 ms) and successful induction of VF in three hearts. In the two remaining hearts FF did not decrease enough (maximally 13 ms) to allow re-entry. Sodium channel blockade applied to myocardium with a short refractory period is antifibrillatory whereas sodium channel blockade of myocardium with a long refractory period is profibrillatory. Our study provides a mechanistic basis for pro- and antiarrhythmic effects of sodium channel blockers in the absence of structural heart disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ruben Coronel (2010) studied Ventricular fibrillation (n=8). Flecainide vs. Baseline (prior to flecainide) was evaluated on Activation time delay of basic and premature beats (S1 and S2) induced by flecainide (p=<0.001). Sodium channel blockade with flecainide was antifibrillatory when applied to myocardium with a short refractory period, but profibrillatory when applied to myocardium with a long refractory period.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f7a292badbc352afe39b8https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2010.00010
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Preliminary Report: Effect of Encainide and Flecainide on Mortality in a Randomized Trial of Arrhythmia Suppression after Myocardial Infarction1989 · 3,316 citations
  2. 2Epicardial Border Zone Overexpression of Skeletal Muscle Sodium Channel SkM1 Normalizes Activation, Preserves Conduction, and Suppresses Ventricular Arrhythmia2008 · 87 citations
  3. 3Dynamic restitution of action potential duration during electrical alternans and ventricular fibrillation1998 · 360 citations
  4. 4Laplacian Electrograms and the Interpretation of Complex Ventricular Activation Patterns During Ventricular Fibrillation2000 · 47 citations
  5. 5Preventing ventricular fibrillation by flattening cardiac restitution2000 · 533 citations