PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1980Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis15 citations

Quantitation of left ventricular wall motion in normal subjects: Comparison of various methods

View Full Paper
VBValmik BhargavaSWSanford E. WarrenWVW. Victor R. Vieweg

Structured PICO

Does the percent change in the square root of area method compare favorably with existing methods for quantitating left ventricular wall motion in normal subjects?

P
Population
48 normal subjects who underwent cardiac catheterization and left ventriculography
I
Intervention
Computer-assisted analysis of percent change in the square root of area in each of 12 consecutive 30-degree, pie-shaped ventricular segments
C
Comparator
Existing radius, area, hemichord, and chord methods
O
Outcome
Quantitation of left ventricular regional wall motion and establishment of objective confidence limitssurrogate

The percent change in the square root of area method offers a robust, theoretically advantageous approach for quantifying left ventricular regional wall motion compared to traditional methods.

Abstract

Computer-assisted analysis of percent change in the square root of area in each of 12 consecutive 30-degree, pie-shaped ventricular segments was obtained in 48 normal subjects who underwent cardiac catheterization and left ventriculography. The information obtained permitted establishment of objective confidence limits for normal left ventricular regional wall motion. As an index of dynamic changes in segmental wall motion, the percent change in the square root of area method compared favorably with existing radius, area, hemichord, and chord methods. It also possessed a variety of theoretical advantages over these techniques: 1) large numbers of points were analyzed, 2) wall motion disorders in all areas except base were evaluated, 3) taking the square root of area's percent change provided both area information with least splay and an average measure of radius.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bhargava et al. (1980) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bca3ed54006be995efc32https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810060103
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Quantitative left ventricular wall motion analysis: a comparison of area, chord and radial methods.1979 · 246 citations
  2. 2Computerized quantitative analysis of left ventricular wall motion by two-dimensional echocardiography.1984 · 128 citations
  3. 3Accuracy of subjective and computer‐assisted assessments of angiographic left ventricular regional wall motion1990 · 5 citations
  4. 4Evaluation of methods for quantitating left ventricular segmental wall motion in man using myocardial markers as a standard.1980 · 167 citations
  5. 5Left Ventricular Wall Motion Assessed by Using Fixed External Reference Systems1973 · 91 citations