PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 11, 2026Transnational Environmental Law0 citationsOpen Access

Pursuing Global Conservation Objectives Unilaterally: Lessons from the EU Deforestation Regulation on Designing Measures that Respect the Interests of Third Countries

JSJessica StubenrauchTMTill Markus

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand the extraterritorial impacts of the EU's Deforestation Regulation and how it affects third countries' interests.
  • Analyzed the extraterritorial effects of the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR).
  • Assessed complaints from Indonesia regarding the EUDR.
  • Used the EUDR as a case study to derive lessons for international environmental policies.
  • Identified specific complaints from Indonesia about the EUDR's impact on its interests.
  • Highlighted unresolved tensions between unilateral environmental regulations and the interests of affected countries.
  • Proposed guidelines for reconciling global environmental objectives with the rights of third countries.

Abstract

Abstract States have agreed to pursue ambitious environmental goals such as limiting the rise in global average temperature, halting the loss of biodiversity, protecting the oceans, curbing land degradation, and preventing pollution. In implementing these common objectives, some states take measures that have extraterritorial effects. These impacts sometimes lead to criticism from affected countries, which feel that their interests are being violated or neglected. This article analyzes the potential extraterritorial effects of the European Union’s Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) and assesses the complaints lodged by Indonesia against it. It will use the development of the EUDR as a case study to learn about the issues arising from environmental measures with extraterritorial effects designed to implement internationally agreed environmental objectives. It will also attempt to draw some general conclusions on how states can unilaterally advance these goals while respecting the legitimate interests of third countries.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stubenrauch et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2a520a80c8f91e7f39e1afhttps://doi.org/10.1017/s2047102526100363
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Global Environmental Governance and the reflexes of The European Union Anti-Deforestation Regulation on brazilian agribusiness2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Meshing or Clashing Gears? Design (In)Coherences Between the EU Regulation on Deforestation‐Free Products and Third Country Environmental Regulations2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3D4.3: Assessing horizontal and vertical policy and regulatory governance (in)coherence2024
  4. 4When the Deforestation Meets the Free Trade: A Critical Analysis of the European Union Deforestation Free Regulation (EU DFR)2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5The Role of the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) in Mitigating Climate Change2025