The circadian system aligns behavior and physiology with the 24-hour environmental cycle through a distributed network of clocks including the master pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and an autonomous retinal clock critical for local retinal physiology and function. Although both clocks are entrained by light, they differ in their photoreceptor inputs and light sensitivity. The specific contributions and mechanisms by which distinct photoreceptor pathways drive their photoentrainment, however, remain incompletely understood.In this study, we conducted a comprehensive transcriptomic and integrative comparative analysis of retinal and SCN circadian responses to 530 nm monochromatic light using mouse models lacking specific photoreceptors or key components of signaling pathways. Under photopic conditions, we found that each tissue displays distinct light-responsive transcriptional signatures across genotypes, yet both shared a conserved cluster of rod-driven immediate early-genes. Strikingly, the light-evoked transcriptional response was not sufficient to shift the phase of the SCN clock, in contrast to its robust phase-shifting effect on the retinal clock. Furthermore, by genetically disrupting rod/cone electrical coupling and pharmacologically isolating rod pathways, we identified the OFF-cone bipolar cell circuit as both necessary and sufficient to mediate light-induced phase resetting of the retinal clock. Together, these findings delineate the specialized retinal circuitry that supports circadian entrainment and highlight a fundamental divergence between retinal and SCN mechanisms of photic timekeeping.
Jandot et al. (Thu,) studied this question.