Key result
An exercise intervention reduces AF burden ~45% vs. usual care without improving AF-specific quality of life.
Why the trial?
Exercise is advised in atrial fibrillation, but whether sustained training actually reduces AF burden — measured objectively with continuous implantable monitoring — and improves quality of life had not been established in a randomised trial.
Does a one-year exercise intervention reduce atrial fibrillation burden and improve quality of life in patients with non-permanent atrial fibrillation?
Population
295 patients with non-permanent AF and low physical activity (3 Norwegian centres)
Comparison
1-year exercise programme (eight supervised HIT sessions + remote) vs usual care
Design
Randomized (1:1) multicenter trial; insertable cardiac monitor in all patients
Follow-up
1 year (continuous ICM monitoring)
Authors
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A one-year exercise programme cut AF burden (3.9% vs 7.1%) without improving AFEQT; supports exercise for burden reduction, not as a quality-of-life intervention.
| Outcome | Exercise | Usual care |
|---|---|---|
| AF burden (% of monitored time over 1 year) | 3.9% | 7.1% |
| Co-primary · p=0.016; 45% relative reduction; CI not reported | ||
| AFEQT overall score change at 1 year | +5.6 | +4.4 |
| Co-primary · p=0.43 — not met | ||
Subgroup caution
The co-primary quality-of-life endpoint was not met (p=0.43), so the AF-burden benefit should not be over-read.
Statistical certainty
No confidence intervals or per-arm sample sizes are reported.
Design limitations
Results come from a conference press release without journal publication, and secondary fitness and hospitalisation improvements are reported without numeric detail.
Does a one-year exercise intervention reduce atrial fibrillation burden and improve quality of life in patients with non-permanent atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: 45% relative reduction
Absolute Event Rate: 3.9% vs 7.1%
p-value: p=0.016
A structured one-year exercise intervention significantly reduced atrial fibrillation burden by 45% in patients with non-permanent AF, though it did not significantly improve AF-specific quality of life.
Bjarne Nes (2026) conducted an RCT in non-permanent atrial fibrillation (n=295). Exercise intervention vs. Usual care was evaluated on Time in AF as a percentage of total monitored time over one year and change in the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) overall score at one year (45% relative reduction, p=0.016). A one-year exercise intervention significantly reduced atrial fibrillation burden compared to usual care (3.9% vs 7.1%; p=0.016), with no significant difference in AF-specific quality of life.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: