Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study reveals knowledge and skills of nurses are linked to EBP implementation, depending on work environment factors.
Background While nurses' evidence‐based practice (EBP) knowledge and skills are critical for its implementation, various factors may act as effect modifiers, potentially influencing the strength of the relationship between EBP knowledge and skills and EBP implementation. Aim To quantitatively evaluate whether various professional and work environment factors modify the strength of the association between EBP knowledge and skills and EBP implementation. Methods This cross‐sectional study was conducted between June and September 2022 among 2672 nurses in Japan. EBP knowledge and skills and EBP implementation were measured using the Japanese version of the EBP Questionnaire. Professional factors, such as years of experience and position, and work environment factors such as organizational attitude toward EBP were measured. Multiple regression analyses evaluated whether the association between EBP knowledge and skills and implementation varied across subgroups. Results Seven hundred seventeen nurses (26.8%) were included in the final analysis. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, EBP knowledge and skills were positively associated with the EBP implementation. Among the seven factors tested, a statistically significant interaction effect on the relationship between EBP knowledge and skills and EBP implementation was observed only for organizational attitude toward EBP. Conclusions The findings suggest that the association between EBP knowledge and skills and implementation may vary depending on the level of organizational support. It may be beneficial for nurse managers and educators to consider integrating EBP into education frameworks to enhance access to EBP learning opportunities. Promoting a workplace culture that prioritizes EBP may also help strengthen its implementation in clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Furuki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: