Systematic review demonstrates reduced re-bleeding risk with anticoagulant therapy in splanchnic vein thrombosis patients with portal hypertension, suggesting potential safety benefits.
Background and Aims: Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) can be associated to liver cirrhosis, or prothrombotic conditions, including myeloproliferative disorders, intra-abdominal inflammation, solid cancers, or surgery. While anticoagulation therapy improves outcomes in non-cirrhotic patients and reduces all-cause mortality in cirrhotic populations, its safety in patients with a history of portal hypertension (PH)-related bleeding is less clear. This systematic review examines the impact of anticoagulant therapy on re-bleeding risk in SVT patients with a history of PH-related bleeding. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was performed for studies published up to September 2024. Studies were included if they compared SVT patients with a history of PH-related bleeding receiving anticoagulant therapy versus those not receiving anticoagulants. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of PH-related re-bleedings. Results: Of 2,853 identified studies, five (186 participants) met the inclusion criteria: two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three observational studies. The cumulative incidence of PH-related re-bleeding was significantly lower in the anticoagulant group at 17.10% [95% CI 17.02, 17.19] compared to the control group at 40.00% [95% CI 39.90, 40.09]. The overall odds ratio (OR) from observational studies was 0.15 [95% CI 0.04, 0.52], indicating a reduced bleeding risk, while the OR from RCTs was 0.84 [95% CI 0.31, 2.32], showing a non-significant trend. Conclusions: Anticoagulant therapy may reduce re-bleeding risk in SVT patients with a history of PH-related bleeding, but further high-quality studies are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: