Key result
Anticoagulants are given to ~77% of patients with acute splanchnic vein thrombosis.
Why the study?
What are the current treatment strategies and factors associated with therapeutic decisions in patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis?
Cohort (n=613)
Yes
What are the current treatment strategies and factors associated with therapeutic decisions in patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis?
Most patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis receive anticoagulant therapy similar to usual site thrombosis, though a significant proportion remain untreated due to specific clinical factors like bleeding risk or incidental diagnosis.
Treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a clinical challenge due to heterogeneity of clinical presentations, increased bleeding risk, and lack of evidences from clinical trials. We performed an international registry to describe current treatment strategies and factors associated with therapeutic decisions in a large prospective cohort of unselected SVT patients. A total of 613 patients were enrolled (mean age 53.1 years, standard deviation ± 14.8); 62.6% males; the majority (468 patients) had portal vein thrombosis. Most common risk factors included cirrhosis (27.8%), solid cancer (22.3%), and intra-abdominal inflammation/infection (11.7%); in 27.4% of patients, SVT was idiopathic. During the acute phase, 470 (76.7%) patients received anticoagulant drugs, 136 patients (22.2%) remained untreated. Incidental diagnosis, single vein thrombosis, gastrointestinal bleeding, thrombocytopenia, cancer, and cirrhosis were significantly associated with no anticoagulant treatment. Decision to start patients on vitamin K antagonists after an initial course of parenteral anticoagulation was significantly associated with younger age, symptomatic onset, multiple veins involvement, and unprovoked thrombosis. Although a nonnegligible proportion of SVT patients did not receive anticoagulant treatment, the majority received the same therapies recommended for patients with usual sites thrombosis, with some differences driven by the site of thrombosis and the pathogenesis of the disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riva et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in splanchnic vein thrombosis (n=613). anticoagulant drugs vs. no anticoagulant treatment was evaluated on therapeutic decisions and current treatment strategies. In a prospective registry of 613 patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis, 76.7% received anticoagulant drugs during the acute phase, while 22.2% remained untreated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: