Comprehensive review reports on imaging modalities' roles in improving safety and efficacy of VT ablation procedures, indicating their critical importance in management.
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with structural heart disease. While catheter ablation has become a cornerstone in VT management, recurrence rates remain substantial due to limitations in electroanatomic mapping (EAM), particularly in cases of deep or heterogeneous arrhythmogenic substrates. Cardiac imaging, especially when multimodal and integrated with mapping systems, has emerged as a critical adjunct to enhance procedural efficacy, safety, and individualized strategy. This comprehensive review explores the evolving role of various imaging modalities, including echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), in the preprocedural and intraprocedural phases of VT ablation. We highlight their respective strengths in substrate identification, anatomical delineation, and real-time guidance. While limitations persist, including costs, availability, artifacts in device carriers, and lack of standardization, future advances are likely to redefine procedural workflows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Notarstefano et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: