Analysis shows digital technologies enhance engagement in equine anatomy for veterinary students, suggesting improved learning outcomes.
This article presents a pedagogical analysis of how digital technologies can be effectively integrated into the teaching of animal anatomy, with a focus on equine osteology. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, technology was seen as a complementary tool in education; however, the crisis highlighted its necessity, especially in subjects with strong practical and laboratory components. The study was conducted with veterinary students at the Federal University of Agreste of Pernambuco (UFAPE) and compared the effectiveness of three instructional methods: (i) three-dimensional (3D) digital models, (ii) photographic images, and (iii) natural anatomical specimens. The research involved 34 students from class A and 48 from class B, divided into three experimental groups during consecutive academic semesters. Each group used only one of the three methods, and their academic performance and perceptions of learning were thoroughly evaluated. The results demonstrated that students who used natural specimens and 3D models achieved comparable academic performance, while those who relied solely on photographs performed significantly worse. Moreover, students rated the experiences with 3D models and natural specimens as more engaging and effective for learning compared to photographs. The study concludes that although natural specimens remain fundamental for teaching animal anatomy, digital resources such as 3D models are powerful complementary tools that enhance the visual and interactive aspects of anatomical science education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: