Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review examines large language models' impact on satellite imagery captioning, indicating gaps in geographic representation and evaluation metrics.
A new generation of geospatial Artificial Intelligence systems that can convert complex Earth observation (EO) data into natural language insights has been sparked by the convergence of satellite imagery and large language models (LLMs). Recent developments in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) applied to geospatial tasks are methodically reviewed in this review, with particular attention to semantic segmentation, satellite image captioning, and spatial question answering. 42 peer-reviewed studies and preprints covering models like BLIP-2, Kosmos-2, Earth-GPT, GeoPix, and GeoRSMLLM that were published between 2020 and 2025 were examined using a structured review protocol. Three main architectural patterns in GeoLLMs are identified by the review: retrieval-augmented or symbolic hybrid systems, end-to-end tuned multimodal transformers, and frozen vision encoders with language adapters. Although domain-specific models demonstrate encouraging outcomes in topological reasoning and pixel-level instruction following, difficulties still exist in geographic generalization, temporal reasoning, and spatial grounding. With little representation of non-Western regions and multilingual contexts, the field is still fragmented in terms of assessment metrics and benchmark datasets. The review summarizes new research avenues to fill these gaps, such as the creation of geometry-aware embeddings, multilingual fine-tuning, and standardized spatial benchmarks. This research offers a thorough basis for developing GeoLLMs as interpretable, scalable, and internationally inclusive geospatial intelligence tools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eyinade et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: