July 23, 2025BMC Medical EducationOpen Access

Interventions designed to increase scholarly activity and achieve promotion among primarily junior clinical faculty in the United States: a scoping review

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

HBHeather BillingsMayo Clinic ADAshlee Mills DuffyUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center GDGary L. Beck DallaghanUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Scoping review identifies interventions that boost scholarly activity in junior clinical faculty, indicating a focus on mentoring and faculty development.

Key Points

Junior clinical faculty often struggle to perform scholarly activity due to heavy clinical workloads and lack of support.
Mentoring, peer-mentoring, and faculty development programs are frequently utilized to enhance scholarly productivity.
The review included 18 publications, with most emphasizing mentoring strategies for improving academic output.
There is a notable gap in high-quality research showing significant benefits of these interventions on scholarly activity.

Cite This Study

Billings et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0621e6551bb0af8cdce0 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07710-w

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Scoping review identifies interventions that boost scholarly activity in junior clinical faculty, indicating a focus on mentoring and faculty development.

Interventions designed to increase scholarly activity and achieve promotion among primarily junior clinical faculty in the United States: a scoping review

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Interventions designed to increase scholarly activity and achieve promotion among primarily junior clinical faculty in the United States: a scoping review

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider