Developmental Change Model for Flourishing in Medical Education restructures environment to promote human flourishing and reduce burnout among medical students.
The anatomy lab has traditionally been a cornerstone of medical education, combining technical skill acquisition with professional identity formation. However, a predominant focus on academic performance, coupled with the intensity of this experience, has raised concerns about learner burnout and diminished humanistic development of students. To address these challenges, we adapted Michael Quinn Patton's Developmental Evaluation—a systems‐based approach to social innovation—as the Developmental Change Model for Flourishing in Medical Education (DCM‐FME). The DCM‐FME provides a flourishing‐centered approach to reframe the educational environment without altering the curriculum or compromising competency outcomes. The DCM‐FME is structured around four key phases: stakeholder engagement, repurposing existing structures, promoting flourishing perspectives and practices, and continuous evaluation. Stakeholder input from faculty, students, and administrators informed changes such as reimagining attendance procedures as reflective check‐ins, restructuring anatomy intern roles to emphasize mentorship, and fostering collaborative learning communities. Flourishing‐focused practices emphasized agency, meaningful relationships, and professional identity. These were facilitated through reflective discussions, peer mentorship, and shared decision‐making. Ongoing evaluation, using tools like the Thrive Assessment, provided actionable insights, enabling iterative improvements for all stakeholders and the educational environment. This approach reframes the anatomy lab as a developmental environment, fostering holistic growth while addressing systemic contributors to burnout. The DCM‐FME offers a resourceful, scalable, and adaptable process for integrating a flourishing‐centered approach to physician formation across medical education. Future efforts will explore longitudinal impacts and broader applications to support the development of compassionate and capable physicians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kranzlein et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: