August 4, 2025

What supports or destabilises the participation of community researchers? Exploring affective flows in co-production processes.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

MAIN FINDING: Community researchers engaged in transdisciplinary research face both supportive and destabilizing factors.
KEY EVIDENCE: Through creative methods, findings illustrate the experiences of 12 local residents in food systems research.
APPROACH: The study employed a new materialist lens and reflexive participant collaboration for data collection.
SIGNIFICANCE: Insights contribute to the development of effective co-production processes in community food initiatives.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Sociological inquiry reveals factors supporting and destabilizing participation of community researchers in food systems, suggesting paths for positive outcomes.

Cite This Study

Gardiner et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0f8de6551bb0af8d0cbb https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2m54j_v2

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Sociological inquiry reveals factors supporting and destabilizing participation of community researchers in food systems, suggesting paths for positive outcomes.

What supports or destabilises the participation of community researchers? Exploring affective flows in co-production processes.

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

What supports or destabilises the participation of community researchers? Exploring affective flows in co-production processes.

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading