Abstract Background: Modern biology lacks a small-axiom, parameter-free framework toexplain why genome architecture, gene regulation, mutation repair, and organ-ismal diversity exhibit consistent ceilings. Information-Pressure Theory (IPT)proposes a fundamental entropy-capacity inequality, originally derived in physics,that can unify these phenomena. Results: We validate eighteen empirically-observed biological limits (e.g. TADsizes, enhancer ranges, coding fractions, transcription bubble lengths, polymerasespeeds, burst timings, overstretch forces, methylation thresholds, nucleosomebreathing times, mutation hotspots, mid-blastula transitions, immune-repertoirediversity) against IPT’s axiomatic bounds, using Hi-C, single-molecule FRET,DNA-combing, synthetic genome, and immune-sequencing datasets. Seventeendata-backed ceilings agree with IPT within ±10%. Five conceptual insights—such as “junk DNA” as entropy sinks, promoter logic as Boolean flux algebra,mutation hotspots as torsional-pressure functionals, entropy clocks for devel-opmental timing, and entropy-overflow ceilings linking synthetic genomes toimmune repertoires—emerge directly. Sensitivity analysis confirms robustness toparameter variation. Conclusions: These results position IPT as a unifying thermodynamic frame-work from nucleosome mechanics to organismal diversity, and suggest concrete,falsifiable assays in genomics, synthetic biology, oncology, and immunology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert Mereau (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: