Meta-analysis demonstrates Lp-PLA2's diagnostic accuracy for plaque stability in atherosclerosis, suggesting clinical usefulness.
Background & Objective: Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), secreted by inflammatory cells within atherosclerosis lesions, has emerged as a promising biomarker linked to plaque stability. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize current evidence on the diagnostic value of Lp-PLA2 as a biomarker of atherosclerotic plaque stability. Methods: Literature were searched from PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, ScienceDirect, SinoMed, Wanfang, and CNKI databases. QUADAS-2 scale was used for quality assessment. Forest plots displayed the sensitivity, specificity, and pooled effects of each study. Clinical applicability of the meta-analysis results was evaluated using positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and diagnostic score. Publication bias was analyzed using Deeks' funnel plot. Results: The pooled results from 22 studies (1110 stable plaque cases and 1298 unstable plaque cases) demonstrate that Lp-PLA2 exhibits significant diagnostic accuracy for plaque stability assessment. The pooled sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.89), specificity was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.85), and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92). The PLR was 4.23 (95% CI: 3.24-5.52), the NLR was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.14-0.25), diagnostic score was 3.12 (95% CI: 2.69-3.54) and DOR was 22.55 (95% CI: 14.79-34.37). Significant heterogeneity might be induced by plaque location (I2 = 75%) and plaque formation criteria (I2 = 77%). Conclusions: Lp-PLA2 is a valuable biomarker for diagnosing plaque stability in atherosclerosis, with high diagnostic accuracy across various vascular territories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: