Key result
Elevated baseline Lp-PLA2 levels were independently associated with an increased risk of re-stenosis one year after stent placement compared to normal levels (8.5% vs 4.6%; HR 1.140).
Why the study?
Does elevated baseline Lp-PLA2 predict re-stenosis after stent placement in patients with coronary heart disease?
Cohort (n=326)
Does elevated baseline Lp-PLA2 predict re-stenosis after stent placement in patients with coronary heart disease?
Hazard Ratio: 1.14 (95% CI 1.068–1.195)
Absolute Event Rate: 8.5% vs 4.6%
p-value: p=0.017
Elevated baseline Lp-PLA2 is an independent predictor of angiographic re-stenosis at 1 year following coronary stent placement.
Lp-PLA2 may refine post-stent re-stenosis risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice without prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) is a novel biomarker for cardiovascular risk prediction. Whether increased Lp-PLA2 level is associated with re-stenosis after stent-placement is unclear. METHODS: Totally 326 participants eligible for stent-placement were enrolled and divided into two groups according to baseline Lp-PLA2 levels (named normal and elevated groups). Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between normal and elevated groups. The relationships between Lp-PLA2 and other risk factors with re-stenosis were evaluated. RESULTS: Only the between-group difference of Lp-PLA2 was significant (123.2 ± 33.6 ng/mL vs 336.8 ± 85.4 ng/mL, P < 0.001) while other demographic and clinical characteristics between these two groups were comparable. Approximately 55.1% and 58.5% of participants in normal and elevated groups presented with acute coronary syndrome, and the percentage of tri-vessels stenoses was significantly higher in elevated group (40.8% vs 32.1%, P = 0.016). Nearly 96.0% and 94.0% of participants in normal and elevated Lp-PLA2 groups were placed with drug-eluting stents, and the others were with bare-metal stents. After 1 year's follow-up, the incidence of clinical end-points was comparable (13.3% vs 15.4%, P = 0.172). Nevertheless, the incidence of re-stenosis was marginally higher in elevated Lp-PLA2 group (8.5% versus 4.6%, P = 0.047). With multivariate analysis, after adjustment for other risk factors, Lp-PLA2 remained an independent predictor for re-stenosis with a hazard ratio of 1.140. No synergistic effect between Lp-PLA2 and other risk factors for re-stenosis was found. CONCLUSION: Increased Lp-PLA2 level is associated with an increased risk of re-stenosis. Lp-PLA2 assessment may be useful in predicting subjects who are at increased risk for re-stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease (n=326). Elevated baseline Lp-PLA2 (≥200 ng/mL) vs. Normal baseline Lp-PLA2 (<200 ng/mL) was evaluated on Re-stenosis (> 50% stenosis of target lesion) (HR 1.140, 95% CI 1.068-1.195, p=0.017). Elevated baseline Lp-PLA2 levels were independently associated with an increased risk of re-stenosis one year after stent placement compared to normal levels (8.5% vs 4.6%; HR 1.140).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: