This review evaluates endovascular aortic repair outcomes in patients with arch pathologies, highlighting stroke and mortality rates.
This review evaluates procedural and technical advancements in branched and fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (B-/F-TEVAR) for aortic arch pathologies, with the main focus on the clinical outcomes, including stroke and mortality. A narrative review of the literature was conducted to assess the evolution of B-/F-TEVAR devices, including branched and fenestrated designs. Key factors such as technical success, perioperative outcomes, and long-term performance were examined across various patient cohorts with the focus on mortality and stroke. B-/F-TEVAR achieves high technical success rates (84%-100%), with 30-day mortality and stroke rates typically ranging from 0%-25% and 3%-36%, respectively. Fenestrated repairs are particularly suited for pathologies involving the lesser aortic curvature, offering reduced mortality (as low as 2% in some studies), while branched repairs provide greater adaptability for complex anatomies, albeit with higher stroke rates in certain cohorts. B-/F-TEVAR has emerged as a feasible treatment option for selected high-risk patients with aortic arch pathology, achieving high technical success. Although outcomes may improve with growing experience, stroke remains a significant complication, and reintervention rates highlight the need for long-term durability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lescan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: