Survey reveals perceived barriers and support needs for promoting critical thinking among teachers in Vietnam.
This study explores the readiness of high school teachers in Northern Vietnam to promote students’ critical thinking (CT). A survey of 103 teachers from 15 mountainous provinces was conducted using a 20-item Likert-scale instrument, covering four dimensions: conceptual understanding, pedagogical practices, perceived barriers, and support needs. The instrument demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.853). Findings reveal widespread consensus on the importance of CT, its cross-subject applicability, and the regular use of open-ended questioning, group discussion, and real-world scenarios. However, notable uncertainty persists regarding curriculum constraints, time allocation, and resource availability—forming a “grey zone” of latent obstacles. Despite strong motivation, a small proportion of teachers remain unsure about CT’s conceptual foundations, indicating a need for targeted professional development. To bridge the gap between intention and sustained practice, the study proposes three actionable strategies: (1) modular training programs focused on instructional design; (2) a ready-to-use CT resource toolkit; and (3) institutional support through workload reduction and innovation incentives. These findings underscore that effective CT integration depends on aligning teacher capacity, practical resources, and organizational support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Le et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: