Exploratory and confirmatory analysis established reliable measures for perceived responsiveness and insensitivity in companion animals.
Companion animal guardianship is widespread; however, little is known about the inner dynamics of human-companion animal relationships. Perceived responsiveness and insensitivity are vital markers of relationship quality within human-human relationships, yet they remain neglected within the human-companion animal context. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a measure of perceived pet responsiveness and insensitivity, as well as a short form measure. The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) phase of this study included a sample of 366 adults, while the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) phase included 368 adults; both samples were British, English-speaking pet owners. The full-scale version of the Perceived Pet Responsiveness and Insensitivity Scale (PPRIS) was found to be 46 items, with 12 of these items retained for the Scale-Short Form (PPRIS-SF) based on their high factor loadings and theoretical content. Both versions of the scale are reliable measures of perceived pet responsiveness and insensitivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: