Abstract Background Person-centredness has become the byword for a modern, high quality care service. Yet measurement of person-centred quality is fraught with difficulty, and existing instruments tend to rely on classical psychometric methods with many untestable assumptions. An important new instrument, the Person-Centred Community Care Inventory, has yet to be subject to modern psychometric techniques.Methods The same 22 initial items used to form the Person-Centred Community Care Inventory were re-examined under a Rasch framework. A re-analysis of nearly 600 questionnaire returns from older people in England with community care needs was undertaken, with this large sample partitioned into a ‘evaluation’ and ‘validation’ sample. In addition, a test-retest inspection of 77 repeat administrations was undertaken.Results Rasch analysis confirmed a more parsimonious form of the scale, comprising two subscales which broadly met key diagnostic tests. Six items evaluated person-centredness in care worker interactions, and a second six items evaluated person-centredness in care plans. When combined into a single 12 item scale using ‘testlets’, the resulting PERCCI-12 suggested satisfactory measurement properties overall, albeit with reduced internal reliability over two separate subscales. Test-retest reliability of the PERCCI-12 was estimated at 0.871 and was robust to sensitivity tests.Conclusion The Rasch evaluation of the PERCCI supports a shorter scale formed of 12 items. This can be analysed as two separate subscales, or as a single summary scale with weaker internal reliability. Future research is needed to reinforce construct validity, to improve interpretability, and to establish minimally important difference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark Wilberforce (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: