Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 11, 2025Urban ScienceOpen Access

Temporal Governance and the Politics of Time Beyond Delay in Spatial Planning

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JGJorge GonçalvesBCBeatriz CondessaSBSofia Bizarro

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis reveals legal reforms impact stakeholder engagement and procedural effectiveness in spatial planning, suggesting the need for adaptive governance models.

Key Points

  • Effective planning outcomes depend on balancing speed with deliberation and strategic foresight, and procedural pragmatism.
  • The 1999 legal framework led to rigidity and inertia, while the 2015 reform introduced governance gaps and reduced stakeholder diversity.
  • This qualitative analysis utilized legal texts and policy documents to explore tensions in governance and procedural timing.
  • Adopting adaptive governance models can enhance environmental resilience, democratic values, and institutional trust.

Cite This Study

Gonçalves et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a35eeb0a429f7973327eabhttps://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9070279
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Temporal regimes in heritage and urban planning: Conceptualising the ordering of past, present and future2026
  2. 2Temporal Governance as a Universal Principle of System Sustainability2026
  3. 3Planning in Time: Temporal Resilience and the Governance of Urban Land Use Change2026
  4. 4The temporal deliberation approach: How to work with time in deliberative processes2026
  5. 5Governing through time(s): temporal modes of governance in digital education policy2024 · 1 citations