Article demonstrates how serious gaming can engage ethical reflection in technology, suggesting new avenues for philosophical inquiry.
In the face of what is called “Existential risks/threats” or “polycrisis” – where digitalization, biomedicalization, and environmental degradation intertwine as existential threats – this article argues for a critical philosophy of technology as a necessary framework for ethical engagement. To address this polycrisis, we elaborate on an approach that integrates ethics and technology through serious gaming. Specifically, we introduce Tethics , a board game designed to engage players in ethical reflection on technological governance. By embedding critical philosophical insights into interactive gameplay, Tethics fosters a dynamic, experiential understanding of ethical dilemmas. Drawing on Andrew Feenberg’s critical theory of technology, we outline how game design can serve as a method for both refining philosophical inquiry and fostering public engagement. We argue that serious games may offer a unique means of interrogating and reconfiguring our relationship with technology, or can successfully act as educational tools for the ethics of technology today. Finally, we argue that Tethics performs a philosophically therapeutic function, debunking the metaphysical underpinnings of an instrumentalist and determinist viewpoint that dominates the current understanding of technology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perperidis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: