Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Model tests reveal support pressure dynamics in excavation face stability for rectangular pipe jacking, indicating critical failure mechanisms.
This study addresses the critical challenge of excavation face instability in rectangular pipe jacking through systematic physical model tests. Utilizing a half-section symmetry apparatus with non-contact photogrammetry and pressure monitoring, the study investigates failure mechanisms under varying overburden ratios and sand densities. Key findings reveal that support pressure evolution follows a four-stage trajectory: rapid decline (elastic deformation), slow decline (soil arching development), slow rise (arch degradation), and stabilization (global shear failure). The minimum support pressure ratio Pmin decreases by 39–58% in loose sand but only 10–37% in dense sand due to enhanced arching effects. Distinctive failure mechanisms include the following: (1) failure angles exceeding 70°, substantially larger than theoretical predictions; (2) bimodal ground settlement characterized by without settlement followed by abrupt collapse, contrasting with gradual transitions in circular excavations; (3) trapezoidal settlement surfaces with equilibrium arch angles ranging 41°–48°. These new discoveries demonstrate that real-time support pressure monitoring is essential for risk mitigation, as ground deformation exhibits severe hysteresis preceding catastrophic rapid collapse. The experimental framework provides fundamental insights into optimizing excavation face support design in shallow-buried rectangular tunneling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: