Cross-sectional study reveals caregiver-reported BMI may misclassify overweight children, suggesting caution in clinical use.
To evaluate the accuracy of caregiver-reported height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) in children attending a pediatric growth clinic, and to explore the impact of these errors on clinical management and telemedicine. This cross-sectional study included 132 children aged 6-12 years attending a pediatric growth clinic. Caregivers reported their children's height and weight, and standard measurements were taken within one week. BMI was calculated for both sets of data. Differences between caregiver-reported and standard measurements were analyzed across gender and age. Bland-Altman and linear regression analyses assessed agreement and correlation. Caregivers slightly overestimated height (+0.6 cm) and underestimated weight (-0.9 kg), resulting in an underestimation of BMI (-0.6 kg/m², p < 0.001). About 4.5% of overweight children were misclassified as non-overweight. Measurement errors showed no significant differences by gender or age group. Most caregivers measured their children's height and weight approximately once per month, regardless of subgroup. Despite minor discrepancies, caregiver-reported and standard data were strongly correlated (R² > 0.9). Bland-Altman analysis revealed good agreement, though height had slightly lower concordance. While caregiver-reported measurements exhibited minor errors, the magnitude was comparable to previous findings in general pediatric populations. Thus, caregiver-reported data may be suitable for follow-up monitoring in pediatric growth clinics but should be used cautiously for initial diagnosis or therapeutic decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: